Julia Allison Implies that Tim Ferriss Gave Her a 15-Minute Orgasm, Wants To Know Why You Think She is a God Damn Asshole

From her post on how awesome Tim Ferriss is because this is what 128-lbs looks like!

Jessie838314 hours ago
I just went to his website and the claims he makes are pretty ridiculous. Apparently this book teaches a person “How to increase fat-loss 300% with a few bags of ice,” “How to sleep 2 hours per day and feel fully rested,” and (my favorite) “How to produce 15-minute female orgasms.” Please! I was genuinely curious about the book when you posted this, but come on… sounds like a total crock to me!

juliaallison [Moderator] 14 hours ago in reply to Jessie8383
haha he’s for real, trust me. very much for real.

But on a more serious note. Why do you “harass”Julia Allison?

A little note to the bullies

So I’m sitting in my hotel room at the Hilton here in Austin, working on my column for this week (on SXSW, of course), and my speech for tomorrow, entitled “Social Media or Sado-Masochism: Cyberbullying and Celebrity 2.0.”  Don’t even ask me how long it took to come up with that title – or how many permutations I explored.  (Hint: a truly pathetic amount of time – and a LOT.)

One of the things I’ve done, to ready for the speech, is revisit my hate site, which I avoid reading, for reasons that are nothing if not obvious.  I didn’t delve into the comments, but I glanced at the last few posts, all of which managed to be both crazy AND obsessed, as well as plain old mean.

So I suppose I would ask you haters, since I know you wait with bated breath for my every post, tweet and Facebook photo: Um … why do you care?  Why do you continue the harassment?  And don’t flatter yourselves: it IS harassment.

When you email my father, my boyfriend, my ex-boyfriends, my editors at Tribune Media Service, my producers at NBC, when you leave comments on every single article I’ve ever written (“It’s a black mark on your paper that you’ve decided to publish her work”), when you create anonymous gmails to begin twitter accounts to tweet me things like “WHOA. Saw pics of u when u worked on the Hill. Homely would be an understatement. I now get why u wear 5lbs of makeup.” and “You’re a mooching slug. Btw, is your father gay? He’s got to be gay.” and WHEN YOU DO IT ALL ANONYMOUSLY – that is harassment.  How do you justify that behavior to yourselves?

Do you believe that you are righting a wrong?  That you are the vigilante enacting internet justice? That I don’t deserve the life that I have and it is your duty to make sure that you destroy it as best you can?  Do you believe that the eight or so examples of me being a dick over the past few years justifies 5-6 posts a day about every … single … thing I write, tweet, photograph or post?  Does it excuse you lying about me (and yes, you have lied, many, MANY times)? Do you believe it means that it is now “fair game” to insult me on a daily basis?

And if this is the case (although I don’t think it is) – that anyone who chooses to have an online presence, be that blog, twitter, facebook or other means – “brings it on themselves” – does that mean you believe that you can say whatever you like – no matter how cruel or denigrating or patently false – about EVERY SINGLE PERSON who chooses to have a presence online? Do you realize how many people that includes? How would you feel if your loved one – or YOU – were getting this sort of treatment?

Do you actually think that hiding behind “free speech” means it’s okay to endlessly harass someone – anyone??  When is enough, enough?

AND IF YOU DO – if you TRULY believe that your behavior is warranted – WHY DO YOU DO IT ANONYMOUSLY?

I would challenge any of the writers on my hate site, or anyone who has commented, to send me an email answering these questions.  Or better yet, come out of hiding.  Admit who you are and why you do what you do.  Self-reflect.  Does it make you feel better about yourself, to tear me down? Is it fun to band together and scapegoat someone whom you have probably never met – but nonetheless have decided to hate?

I would contend that you will never – EVER – change your opinion of me, no matter what I do.  You have decided you know who I am, and you will stick with that.  But how long will you remain in the shadows, deriving pleasure by hurting someone else?

Yes, please help Julia Allison prepare for her 15-minute talk, since she has failed to prepare until the last minute. I will just say, that this site strongly encourages that no one contact Julia, her employers, her family, her donkey fuckers or anyone else in her life.

Oh, and the only reason why people contacted her father is because he was throwing cease and desists any which way, and Julia was having innocent people harassed because she claimed that these people were involved in this site. They were not, but that didn’t stop Julsie from orchestrating a desperate campaign to attempt to ruin the lives of anyone she even thought was tangentially associated with this site.

Other than that, do your own homework, Donks.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

332 Responses to Julia Allison Implies that Tim Ferriss Gave Her a 15-Minute Orgasm, Wants To Know Why You Think She is a God Damn Asshole

  1. Loren Feldman says:

    First!! My name is Loren Feldman and I have no problem saying that I think Julia Allison is scum. A braying mean lunatic who thinks she’s better than everyone else. I WANT my name to be associated with my statements because I stand by them. If others choose to remain anonymous that is their right to do so. In the meantime, my name is Loren Feldman and I think Julia Baugher is common trash.

    • Natasha says:

      Yeah, as I said on her post, I really don’t care if she knows who I am. But that doesn’t mean that other people feel that way, and given her and her father’s behavior, they have every right to be concerned.

    • darling mrs. melissa sue [calm down!] says:

      Seriously. I’ve never once contacted her, her family, her friends or her boyfriends. She, on the other hand, has tried to destroy this site and people she believes are involved with it. Why would I want her to have my real name? (Which she could easily have, by the way, if she really wanted to.)

      • JFA says:

        Please. I would bet my left tit that at least 95% of commenters here have never done anything like that. At the very least, if not more.

        She’s fucking lying to get sympathy. Like it’s our fucking fault some people act batshit and contact her ass. STOP GOING ON TV IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT you fucking dipshit. Stop courting fame then. Goddamnit she’s so irritating.

    • Eight Dollar Grapefruit says:

      Common trash that might become a McCain someday, if she sucks dick well enough.

  2. flatface says:

    I applaud the things I like and jeer the ones I don’t.

    If a singer (or dancer, or speaker, or whatever) gets on stage and is routinely booed, whose fault is it if s/he won’t leave the stage? Is the audience harrassing the performer? Should the performer have the “right” to receive nothing but applause.

    This also ignores Julia’s content: which has been specifically about the internet. From day one. From day one Julia thought she the internet was the ultimate freedom. She could bypass all the normal traditional routes to prominence and do it all herself. And not only that SHE COULD TEACH YOU HOW TO DO IT TOO.

    Very presumtuous. Almost begging for opposing feedback.

    She forgot one thing: you do have to be well-recieved. People do have to like your content/performance/whatevere.

    Keep singin’. We’ll keep booing.

    • Shrug Bitch says:

      “If a singer (or dancer, or speaker, or whatever) gets on stage and is routinely booed, whose fault is it if s/he won’t leave the stage? Is the audience harassing the performer? Should the performer have the “right” to receive nothing but applause.”

      THIS x 100. Though now I’m picturing her in the slutty ballerina costume from 2(?) Halloweens ago re-enacting scenes from Black Swan…

      • One Fat Melman says:

        THIS. Definitely picturing her driving around LA alone looking for friends that Halloween.

        Also, Julesy, let me break it down for you:

        You have haters because you suck. Suck less and maybe this “bullying” you’re experiencing will “get better,” you know, like it does for your favorite gays…the same ones whose right to marry Kirk voted against…

      • One Fat Melman says:

        Hilarious that a “reader” just sent this to her:

        http://julia.nonsociety.com/post/3865867780

    • God Help Her... says:

      Nailed it flatface!

  3. Delurked says:

    Julia, if you’re going to consider this website harassment, then all of your 9000 billion TV appearances in which you criticized celebrity behavior would be considered harassment as well. People on this website discussing ON THIS WEBSITE the things that YOU MAKE PUBLIC is the exact same thing as you GOING ON TV and talking about celebrities’ PUBLIC BEHAVIOR.

    I could go on, but I have errands to run at my desk, and frankly, I do not care enough to take the time.

  4. Expired Cupcakes says:

    I’ve never contacted her or any of her stablemates. I just watch from a distance and laugh. Good enough quote for you Julia?

    • Expired Cupcakes says:

      …and why is the laughter so directed at you Julia? Because you set yourself up as an EXPERT on everything, you want the world to believe you are a professional expert on… anything – how to live, dress, eat, exercise, how to relate to other human beings, dating, marriage……

      And that’s what’s so laughable.

      You are not just an innocent little girl going about your blameless life, you actively preach dysfunction as a way of life.

      Look at you, you can’t even pose naturally in a photograph, you can’t even stand yourself enough not to twist your body and be photographed without a coat of paint and fake hair.

      So when you stop evangelizing a completely superficial mode of life, then maybe you’ll stop being criticized so much.

      But you know all this already, you’ve been told over and over again, you seem unable to change. Watching you is like watching Baby Jane Hudson.

      Pass the popcorn.

    • Shrug Bitch says:

      Yes, JP, Jacy and PP have all repeatedly stated that they do not condone any RBD commenter contacting Jabs or anybody associated with her. It’s much more fun if you just let the crazy unfold…

  5. flatface says:

    And as far as anonymity goes: it’s just smart. The lower one’s public on-line profile is the better. You just never know. You never know what comment you make could come back and haunt you. Members of audiences have always been anonymous, for the most part. Julia decided not to be because she wanted to be famous. She needed her name out there. She thought it was brave, forward-looking and all that. But it was also a major, major mistake. One many online personalities have realized. Now, though, rather than lower that profile, thet turn non-anonymity into some kind of virte. Like they’re brave for having their face out there. Maybe. To a certain extent. But you’re also stupid. You cannot hire enough reputation scrubbers to totally wipe out the mistakes of your 20’s. That shit’s forever now.

    • Again, Feel Free to Relax says:

      Yes! And *shocker* not everyone wants to be famous, or infamous, or “have an online presence.”

  6. KashMoney says:

    you know what else? it’s not that there are haters out there. it’s that there are no lovers. we’re not the loudest because we have the numbers. we’re the loudest because NO ONE is arguing with our thesis.

    did JAB ever ask herself why there are no JAB fanpages? WORRISOME.

    • Again, Feel Free to Relax says:

      I will admit, I came here after being a fan of Julia. She doesn’t need haters to turn people off to her – she even turns her fans against her. I doubt I’m the only one that has crossed over.

      • Pancakes with a side of Pancakes with a side of of cray cray says:

        I have also crossed over to the funnier side.

  7. Shamoolia says:

    “Do you believe that the eight or so examples of me being a dick over the past few years…”

    Only eight?

    • Brianna says:

      Yeah, I choked at that one, too.

      • Helena (Wooly Bully) says:

        Also, it’s not just “being a dick.” Stop flattering yourself, you pathetic sadsack. It’s also “being an imbecile.” Remember the time you claimed that before the internet, people had no means of creativity? Remember the time when you, as a real journalism-loving journalist and a real social media expert, asked strangers online about “a big social media story never told before” so you could write your internationally syndicated column for “over 100+ newspapers?” Remember your insightful comments about Egypt, Libya, “revolutionaries” in Davos, Schiap pink, a “German-born designer,” Lolita and Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer? Remember the time you asked your haters to write your SXSW speech for you? Yeah, that.

        Also, rest assured that you couldn’t pay me enough to contact you or anyone willingly associated with you, you disgusting piece of shit. Again, stop flattering yourself and feel free to relax.

        • Ridonkulous says:

          And remember when she described a designer as a “Wunderkind,” pronouncing it the way you would when saying the sentence “Wonder Bread is kind of lame?”

          Fucktard.

          • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

            There are myriads of examples like this. And I know that even though I’ve only known about the Donkey horrorshow since July 2010, and no, Donkey, I do not “wait with bated breath for your every post, tweet and Facebook photo.” I’m not on Facebook (imagine that, I could just live just as easily if zomg Zuckerbergs never existed) or Twitter, and I only check your hobbysite once or twice per month. I read most of RBD, that’s all, and that’s exactly as interesting as you’ll ever be to me.

            It’s literally-laugh-aloud funny that she doesn’t realize this kind of stupidity is (more than) ENOUGH to turn indifferent people into haters. You pose as a PROFESSIONAL, Donkey, and you don’t know SHIT, and you are NOT embarrassed in the slightest. It’s truly unbelievable (and worrisome) that you think your schtick is cute just because you claim to like pink cupcakes.

        • Handbag Stuffed With Hair says:

          Oooh, Helena just roared into town.

          • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

            I’m too old and rich to get really outraged over this (and I’m neither old nor rich), but I do believe that her total ignorance about pretty much everything, including many of the things she claims to WUV / be “an unabashed fangirl of” combined with her total disinterest in learning anything is enough to turn an average functionally literate adult into a screaming jealous hateful bully. Posing as an educated professional in the know when you’re deeply ignorant is outreageous, offensive, and harmful. Your regular squeaking to the effect of “I love learning! I read books! This is profound!” doesn’t actually help, either, Donkey.

            I mean, this is not a matter of “different strokes,” of people’s differing opinions on “self presentation” or “sharing” or any of that other nonsense. Those are cold hard facts: she repeatedly displays stunning lack of knowledge about things that are, at the very least, easily googleable, but that should be well known to any “journalist” / “expert” in the first place. As if that weren’t horrible enough (and trust, Donkey, it is), she completely lacks any semblance of common sense, too; hence her cringeworthy-as-all-hell attempts at articulating original thoughts. Case AND point (shout out to Mary): “Before the internet, people had no means of creativity.” That dysfunctional cretin actually SAYS THESE THINGS IN PUBLIC!!

            I rest my case.

            *leans back, checks nails*

          • Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

            THIS–> “Posing as an educated professional in the know when you’re deeply ignorant is outreageous, offensive, and harmful.”

            you sound like an expert on fraudsters, grifters, and phonies. i would like to subscribe to your internationally syndicated column.

          • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

            *outrageous, not “outreageous.” Feel free to calm down!

    • If I documented my life you know how many times my actions would fall under “being a dick”? None. Zero. Zip. Nada. I don’t have restraining orders against me. My dog is happy to see me. Nobody’s ever slapped me. I don’t have plagiarism charges against me. I’ve never contacted any of my exes or their new pieces in any way.

      So Julia, if you look like an asshole and act like an asshole, chances are you’re really an asshole. I’m not going to say get off the internet. I’m going to say, quit being an asshole.

      • geo-bragnostic says:

        Damn. Using a normal definition of “being a dick,” I’ve been a dick too many times to count. But, you know, every day, in every way, I’m… trying to be less of a dick, which doesn’t actually seem to be true in Julia’s case.

        There are always times when you could have been kinder or more considerate. But Julia’s “eight” instances aren’t dickishness – they’re full-blown psychosis. Seriously, the violations of social norms, ethical lines, and just plain common sense are way out of dick territory.

      • Handbag Stuffed With Hair says:

        You know I slapped you once, Stalker, but only because you begged.

  8. Julia's Rough Opening says:

    Julia, I have responded to your nonsense via Twitter. My twitter handle is my real name. Not my first and middle name, either.

    Also? If you’re all for transparency, then why not require ALL commenters on your blerg to include their full names, or is it because they do not in fact exist in the material sense?

  9. Brayday Cray says:

    Hey RBD — any concrete proof of Dadsers cease & desists? I believe it 100%, but she’s claiming in the comments on her blog that the cease & desists are one of the many lies made up on this site.

    Concrete evidence would be great, just to prove her wrong & shut her up.

    • Expired Cupcakes says:

      I believe PDFs were shared that the time, with Dad$er’s letterhead and address.

      • white coat says:

        Um, err, oops…?

      • Brayday Cray says:

        ….can someone with an account please post that in response to the comment where she says it is a lie? Chances are she won’t publish it, but if she’s going to deny THAT, then someone needs to ask her why her Dad hasn’t taken legal action on whosoever was posing as him. If someone is impersonating Dadsers (which, obviously, no one is, but that is that what Donks is claiming?) then that is a SERIOUS offense that I doubt any professional lawyer would just let slide under the rug.

      • The Tortuous and the Hair says:

        He misspelled “tortuous.”

        • crazytrain says:

          you’re joking right?

          • The Tortuous and the Hair says:

            I am! Look at my username, it was from an incoherent threatening email sent by someone pretending to be a lawyer (Julie or Emily?) circa the time WP took RBNS down. It was nonsensical for a number of reasons, at first purporting to be from some sort of agent or representative, “My client brought to my attention…” and rambled over into, “…you do not have my permission to post my likeness!” The writer was trying to sound super-legallish & tortious was spelled “tortuous.”

        • Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

          no, sorry to say he was correct, he meant ‘tortious’, “of, pertaining to, or characteristic of torts; wrongful”.

    • The Manta says:

      She’s not talking about the letters. She’s claiming we said Dadsers made the actual phone calls. She’s right. He didn’t. All he did was send the C&D letters. She got Emily Rose to make the calls or at least knew about them and won’t admit it.

    • legalese! She says Daddy never CALLED people AT THEIR WORKPLACE. That was Emily.

    • Big Head Fraud & the Blondsters says:

      “…the only reason why people contacted her father is because he was throwing cease and desists any which way…”

      Respondents.
      They are called: R E S P O N D E N T S
      They responded to wild accusations & set the record straight.

      Gawker started the Point-&-Laugh-at-the-tranwreck-Julia-Allison ball rolling years ago — she had the real names of numerous people back then, & she did exactly what w/ that info? She used it to contact them to provide tips to generate more discussion of Julia Allison.

      This site differs how?

    • Jacy says:

      What???

  10. Dancing With Myself says:

    I don’t know why, but the song “History Repeating” by The Propellerheads is going through my head today.

  11. McCain in the Ass says:

    “Julia Allison” doesn’t like anonymity?

    YOU DON’T EVEN PUBLISH UNDER YOUR REAL NAME!

    • Andy Whorehol says:

      THANK YOU. This woman actually claims to have changed her name because she didn’t want people to stalk her or her family, or some bullshit like that. And yet for someone so supposedly intent on protecting her family name, it’s pretty interesting to note that over half the public videos and photos on her website are of her family and their various homes/locations during rather intimate family moments. Bitch please.

      This is also a blogger who regularly displays:
      -Lack of transperancy
      -Constant lying
      -Obvious fame/social-climbing
      -Constant name-dropping
      -Greedy materialism
      -Bitchy commentary
      -Lack of humor
      -Lack of free, uncensored online commentary
      -Lack of self-awareness/self-control

      And yet she wonders why some people don’t like her?

  12. Shamoolia says:

    This place exists because Nonsociety did not enable comments and deleted comments from QOTD back when they launched. She suppressed openness and honesty on her own damn website, from day one. This place wouldn’t exist if she hadn’t done that.

    • fl00fy says:

      yeah, and remember when TMI Weekly comments were a free-for-all skirmish between lovers and haters of the NonSociety fameball choo choo? Until the interns clamped down and everyone took it to RBNS.

  13. Meow_Mix says:

    I’ve been away on vacation for a week or so and have missed you catladies and catmen! I was worried that I’d miss some serious cray, like a Flapjacks proposal or an um…er..oops? accidental pregnancy, but it’s just been the same old cray.

  14. wonkeye says:

    Most bloggers/writers/internet personalities/whatever-the-fuck-Julie-Albertson-thinks-she-is don’t have sites devoted to mocking them because they’re not completely loathsome human beings.

    • Albie Quirky says:

      PAY ATTENTION TO ME! PAY ATTENTION TO ME! THE INTERNET EXISTS ONLY TO PUBLICIZE ME!

      waaaahhh, why don’t some people like my endless self-publicizing on the Internet? They’re mean old meanies!

  15. JustaDude says:

    She wants answers? She wants ANSWERS?! Every post here highlights her abhorrent behavior. Every one. She refuses to see herself how she is. NPD. I really hope someone tactfully calls her out on thus during her panel.

    • Andy Whorehol says:

      We’re all just “haters” to her. Nameless, faceless “haters”, not real human beings with real opinions and intellects. Ironically enough, I’m willing to bet money that she feels the same way about her “fans” as well.
      It’s Julia Allison’s world, we just happen to live in it!

    • Shamoolia says:

      It’s not a panel, just a 15 minute speech, so there will be no open mic. Just like her columns and blog … NO FEEDBACK ALLOWED!

      • Andy Whorehol says:

        Your opinion doesn’t count, hater.

      • Donkey of Perdition says:

        So when her critics are more then willing to have a face-to-face dialogue with her and drop the cloak of anonymity, she explicitly denies them the opportunity and simultaneously brays about their cowardice.

        Donkey you cannot have your oats and barley and eat them too.

    • hoosierlawyerdaddy says:

      seriously. she can’t handle the truth… julia, why is it people don’t like you? why is it people don’t dislike other web 2.0 personalities to the same extent? if it is all us, why don’t we mock all those other folks? what is different about you and other people that could lead to different reactions. rather than using the diplomatic dumping cliche, let me suggest – It’s not us, it’s you.

      • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

        Exactly. NICE GIRLS don’t typically have “hate sites.” Furthermore, happy successful professionals with interesting lives and fulfilling relationships don’t whine about jealous haters, but we’ve all been through this many times.

  16. Who do you think you are? says:

    And a follow-up post on stopbullying.gov. Didn’t you catladies point it out last week?

    Methinks she’s waiting until exactly now to prepare for tomorrow’s presentation. At a national conference. Are we surprised?

    • HipsterLawyerGrifter says:

      There is so much lulzy content on the bullying site, given the context that she posted this to her blog as a warning for us not to exercise the right to our opinions. I missed the other post where this was mentioned, so I may be repeating what someone else said, but I shall list a few main points:

      – The categories are for kids, teens, and young adults. She is none of these.
      – This is obviously geared towards bullying in school or by schoolmates.
      – Someone is bullying others if he/she: “Gets into physical or verbal fights with others”; “Has extra money or new belongings that cannot be explained”; “Is quick to blame others”; and/or “Will not accept responsibility for their actions.”
      – “Myth: people who bully are insecure and have low self-esteem.”

      So yeah. Selective editing is a double-edged sword, Jankles. Keep that in mind next time, maybe.

  17. Shamoolia says:

    Julia Allison Baugher, hater of internet anonymity:

    Julia Allison
    I have a serious crush on Moot of @4Chan.
    July 20 from Twitter

    http://friendfeed.com/juliaallison/7eca9aed/i-have-serious-crush-on-moot-of-4chan

  18. McCain in the Ass says:

    What’s wrong with anonymity?

    If we put identifying information on the internet it only encourages creeps like Randi’s brother to mine and sell it.

    FUCK YOU.

  19. Albie Quirky says:

    RL stalking is shitty behavior. Amazingly enough, some people are shits, including Joolzballz haters.

    That said, Internet commentary is not RL stalking. Live by the Internet publicity, die by the Internet publicity. If you go out on the series of tubes every fucking day of your life saying ‘PAY ATTENTION TO ME! PAY ATTENTION TO ME!’ you don’t get to decide which kinds of attention you get.

    And Joolzballz, you have been a jerk way more than eight times in your life. You probably knock off eight examples of narcissistic behavior bordering on the sociopathic every morning before your breakfast of the pink cupcake you’re OH SO ALLERGIC to but eat anyway and the diet Coke that you claim not to drink.

    • Andy Whorehol says:

      Exactly! The funny thing is, **every** internet personlity/well-known blogger has “haters”. Everyone from Perez Hilton to ijustine to Jane Aldridge and so on. DIFFERENT OPINIONS, wowsers, what a concept! It goes with the territory and yes, that’s the beautiful part of free speech online. If you put your shit out there trying to be the next great internet celebrity, YOU don’t have the power to decide whether or not people will automatically love what you post and present of yourself online. Why not just take it in good humor and laugh at it? Even the likes of Snookie are “in” on the joke that is her current “career”. Otherwise, you’re every bit as idiotic as Julia Allison.

    • Helena (Wooly Bully) says:

      She’ll never address the fact that a vast majority of her mean jealous haters wouldn’t even think of contacting her or her dadsers or her zomg boyfriends or her “employers.” (In fact, I would go to great lengths to avoid her, and I don’t think I’m the only one. I’ve only checked her site maybe five times since the beginning of the year, always because someone here linked to it.) She will never address any of the “reasons for hatred” that we repeatedly cite here, either. Instead, she will forever and ever play the victim card and whine as publicly as possible: “Why, why, why are you so mean to me? Why don’t you tell me, why? Why can’t you understand that it’s BAAAAD to call my dadsers and lie about me? Yes, yes, it is harrassment and you are bullies! Why, why, why?”

      Mind you, JA Baugher, it’s not that I CARE that you blatantly misrepresent us haters (and many, many other parts of reality). Carry on and pretend that we don’t point and laugh, we create fake internet identities 24/7 just so we could “get” to you and “destroy” your soi-disant life. (Speaking of your life, you definitely “deserve” it, no worries about that, bunny!) Go tell it on the mountain. Every one of your anti-bullies manifestos gives me more reasons to laugh at how much of a narcissistic idiot you are.

      • HELENA YOU ARE ON FIRE TODAY!!!

        Never leave RBD.

        • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

          Actually, I stayed away for a couple of days because I was overly disgusted by a couple of recent examples of Donkeyism. Good job, Donkey, you got so repulsive that a hater went away to privately vom in the shower! You really shouldn’t have gone the “why, bullies, why?” route again, because THAT lured me back as quickly as a ruby bracelet from Billy Idol would.

      • hoosierlawyerdaddy says:

        “Speaking of your life, you definitely “deserve” it, no worries about that, bunny!”

        golf clap

    • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

      Actually, I think that the people who were harassed by phone calls from FakeJack’s LOLyer and even those who got the C&D letters from Dadsers have a right to go “real life” on her in return. I sure as hell know that if she or her weird father contacted me in real life, I wouldn’t just shut up and take it.

      • Albie Quirky says:

        Oh, yeah, where she brought it RL an RL pushback makes total sense.

        But there are people who inappropriately bring things RL in every Internet space. I have had a dead animal mailed to me by one of my Internet haters, for instance. Joolzballz thinks she’s the only person who’s ever had haters, of course, because of the NPD.

        • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

          Wow. Sending you a dead animal is seriously disturbed.

          Just my opinion, but I have no problem with people bashing her in the comments section of articles she’s “written.”

          I know this will not be popular with many people, but I have no problem letting any sponsor or anyone who employs her know that I find her so offensive that I will not buy anything she’s associated with.

          Every time I pass that Melissa’s Cupcakes place near Union Square and am tempted to grab a cupcake, I remember that this place gave free cupcakes to last year’s birthcray bash. Then I keep walking.

          • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

            I wouldn’t do it (contact her sponsors) because I just don’t care enough, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it, either. They made a business decision and it cost them a customer; it’s only fair to let them know.

          • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

            Precisely. I haven’t done it a long time, mostly because I don’t think it makes a difference. But when I did contact companies to let them know that their affiliation with donkey cost them my business, I was calm and used tangible reasons and examples. I also pointed out her abrasive and unlikable personality.

  20. Donkeys Have Expiration Dates says:

    I think the reason most of us choose anonymity is clear; Julia Allison and her father are extremely litigious, and we don’t want to tempt them to file frivolous lawsuits against us in their attempts to bully to silence those who point and laugh at the Donkey.

  21. Again, Feel Free to Relax says:

    Looks like Dad is a bully, too:

    Julia: So why do you want to disagree with me so badly?

    Dad: It’s the assuredness and certitude and manner in which you say things that immediately drives me nuts. I think A) who the hell is she and B) she doesn’t know this and C) even if she’s not wrong, she sounds wrong! She should be wrong!

    http://blog.juliaallison.com/2007/08/lazyish_sunday.html

  22. Knocked Up Toddlers and Tiara's says:

    Telling her to do her own homework is exactly right. Every single one of these questions are answered repeatedly in previous opposes and comments.

  23. bitchface says:

    hi Julia! You know me. In fact you’ve met me at five different events. I’ll bet that you don’t remember though, because you immediately looked past me to someone more interesting. No biggie. Time is short and you were there to network with male co-founders (ie husband troll). More power to you with your tits shoved in my face inappropriately dressed as you may be. I enjoy “characters” as much as the next person. They are amusing to watch.

    You want to know why I don’t like you? There is nothing to like. You’re superficial, vain, narcissistic, insecure, and downright mean. Even that I could look past, if you’d own it. But you don’t. You’re all “lalala PINK lalala WIMMIN IN TECH lalala JACK lalala WORSHIP MEEEEEE lalala H8TRZ SUCK YOU GUYS”. You have no original thoughts. You think vapid things are meaningful. Even all that’s fine and dandy except for this: you go through life as if you are entitled to not work hard (sorry, staying up until 4am googling yourself and scarfing down your boyfriend’s mother’s cookies is NOT work), you have no concept of what it takes to survive, to work hard, YET YOU ACT AS THOUGH YOU DO. This is what brings out the “braygies” in so many people who know you.

    I say your name in Silicon Valley circles and am met with eye rolls or laughter. You’re not a good writer. You’re a fake friend – you only like people who can do something for you or whom you presume to be higher up on the food chain than you are – and an ass kisser.

    I’m seriously, can you tell me one thing TO like? I tried. I failed. And I hate pink cupcakes. Amusingly, I like several of your “friends”. I’ve never broached the topic of you to them, but I wonder what will happen if I ever get to….

    • Shamoolia says:

      Can we please repost a link (or just the entire post) of the awesome 300+ comment thread with all the people here who met or knew Julia Allison Baugher in real life and STILL did not have anything good to say about her?

    • DSM V: JFA Edition says:

      Co-sign. the over the shoulder looking when she meets people (even though some of us were in a position to help her career if we so chose) is just like her O.B.O. her man friends. julia you leave a distaste in the mouth of many people. and i think your career trajectory of late (not to mention your “friendships” in ny) highlight how that comes home to roost…

      • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

        How funny it was, even then, that she thought she was such hot shit and was going to be SO fucking famous, rich and married to a hot, wealthy guy. She assumed it was coming to her because she exists and wants it, and that she could be cruel to those she deemed to be at a lower station in life.

        How did that work out for you, Chunkster?

    • Can-Swiss says:

      Well fucking said.

  24. Shamoolia says:

    Also …. she wants to champion social media while at the same time rallying against online anonymity????

    YOU CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!!

    HOW can she not realize this? HOW can she be so dumb? It baugles.

    • darling mrs. melissa sue [calm down!] says:

      THIS! I said this (less eloquently) last week. She should be championing social media, not crying about her haters. She actually had a chance with this international column (hahah), but she’s even managing to fuck that up.

  25. flatface says:

    Also: how many frigging times has she done exactly this? “Engaged” her haters to ostensibly find out what they object to? She’s come in and done chats with us, she’s e-mailed with individual commenters, she’s invited people to coffee, she’s run to gawker and enagaged people there… Every few months she decides she can come in and convince people -either to like her or clear the hall and her let her SHINE.

    You embraced all the internet 1.0 and web 2.0 cliches. About “freedom” and narriers falling and all this get-rich quick shit. And hey, it kinda worked. You got that Wired cover you can’t shut up about. And that Sony commercial.

    But another thing happened. You became a rallying point for people who hate web 2.0 shit. Who hate fame-whores. Who hate self-promotion. Webutards.
    It’s out of your hands. It’s not really about you entirley anymore. You’re just the prompt. The jumping-off point for a larger discussion.

    But you’ve heard this before. On TMI, on the chats here with us. On gawker. A million times.

    See you again in six months.

  26. DonkeyPunch says:

    “FUCK YOU, ASSHOLE.”
    -the random RBNS (now RBD) reader that Julia Allison Baugher & (likely) Emily Rose harassed and bullied and threatened at work acting as “Jack McCain’s lawyer”

  27. Aggressively Stupid says:

    Hi Donkey!
    I have contacted you using my real name with criticism of a shitty thing you did just a couple of months ago. You didn’t get back to me.

    I’m not sure why you think you’re the only public person I criticize. I criticize many public people who I think do shitty things and praise many people who I think do good things. I have the freedom to do that (view details of a person’s life and comment on them publicly, either anonymously or not) because these people put details of their lives on a public forum. If you don’t like being criticized for how you choose to live your life then I would recommend you stop sharing details of your life.

    I don’t agree with people contacting in your life (except for your father, he was sending C&D letters to commenters so they have to right to answer those letters), but you need to recognize that the only reason anyone knows who you work for, who you date or who your family members are is because YOU publish these details online. You need to accept some responsibility or quit complaining (preferably both).

    • Albie Quirky says:

      I’m not sure why you think you’re the only public person I criticize.

      I’ll take “Incredible Narcissism” for $400, Alex!

      • Pink Palatian says:

        For all of you people with PhDonks…

        http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/wrg/2253927541.html
        Need an Author for Personality Disorder Book (Anywhere)
        Date: 2011-03-08, 11:38AM EST
        Reply to: gigs-gcmcq-2253927541@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]

        Trade publisher seeking author for general audience book on narcissistic personality disorder. Must be written in an impartial and unbiased style, and geared toward readers living with/related to/working with those who suffer from narcissism. Please note this project has a final deadline of June 15, and both the deadline and compensation are not negotiable.

        An author with an advanced degree in psychology is strongly preferred; any experience working with patients coping with narcissistic personality disorder is a big plus.

        If you think you are a good fit for this project, please email me with your qualifications.

        * Location: Anywhere
        * it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
        * Compensation: $5,000 (work-for-hire)

        • Handbag Stuffed With Hair says:

          Wow. I just responded to this add, because I absolutely could write that book. How interesting would it be? THANKS.

  28. Again, Feel Free to Relax says:

    Julia would have nothing to talk about if it weren’t for this site. Her true internet fame died a long time ago when she peaked on the cover of “Wired” and was eventually shamed out of NYC for her asshole antics. If this site didn’t exist, she would be like Batman in a Gotham City with no crime. It’s her only identity. She has no substance other than speaking out on haterzzz. I don’t know any other online personalities, or TV personalities, even, that speak out on their dedicated pages of “hatesites.” (Though, I’d pay a shitload to see the Duggars confront theirs.)

    She should take her own advice: if you don’t like our content, stay off our page. In fact, I forbid you to read here.

    • Again, Feel Free to Relax says:

      Also, since this is sure to be a well read thread, I’m going to put a little link right here regarding Japan relief since I know many catladiez love the animals.

      Presumably, many of you have seen the search dogs that have flown in for the rescue. Their work history is really phenomenal (check their website linked below if interested – you can even meet the search teams deployed to Japan!) Anyway, the organization, “Dog Bless You” has gotten some attention thanks to SXSW. “Dog Bless You” is affiliated with http://www.SearchDogFoundation.org and has teamed up with the Annenberg Foundation. Annenberg will donate $100,000 dollars to the Search Dog Foundation if 100,000 people “like” it on Facebook. Just click here to like:
      http://www.facebook.com/exploredogs?sk=app_4949752878

      Now we’ve all done something good today. What have you done, Julie?

      • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

        Thanks for the links, AFFTR. This was one of the reasons I didn’t comment this past weekend. I have two friends in the Tokyo area, and even though I fortunately found out fast enough that they and their families were okay, I just couldn’t the donkey when there were real horrible things happening in my friends’ country.

        • Handbag Stuffed With Hair says:

          I’ve stayed up until very late every night reading one news item after another, Helena. I can’t even think about anything else. I don’t understand why so many people in America don’t get it. There are people in a panic because if there are — God forbid — complete meltdowns at five nuclear reactors? what if radiation blows across the Pacific? RIGHT?!? You mean that what happens to the Japanese happens TO ALL OF US? You mean that the least of these, my brethren, is CONNECTED TO ME SOMEHOW? Jesus bloody Christ, people, grow up. It is one world; all suffering is our suffering.

  29. cupcake cray cray says:

    so, her bullies have infringed on her life so much and done so many things to contact her family, friends, employers, etc., that she had to come here to read some entries for material for her speech? if we were harassing her and so involved in her daily life, I would think she would have material at the ready, and not need to go hunt for it.

  30. Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

    Donkey wants to be famous, but demands that everyone love and admire her. She expects the men to want her and the women to want to be her, not seeing that she’s disgusting and a joke.

    When talking about online bullying, will she tell them about emailing the ex’s fiancee with tales of overlapping sex? Or how she twice outed JL’s alleged mental illness, and then demanded a Mac Air from him? Or the Bolt Bus Bitch incident? No, it’s all going to be about poor, fat Julia and how everyone is soooooo mean to the asshole.

  31. Albie Quirky says:

    We make you feel real, don’t we, Joolzballz? Like you’re a real celebrity?

    You’re not.

    P.S. — I’ve gotten death threats as a result of my actual journalism (that I wrote myself without my mommy’s help). Just like pretty much every other goddamned person who works in a public-facing communications role.

    • Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

      good thing Julie Albertson is working towards a zero tolerance policy for hatred – don’t you feel safer already?

    • Handbag Stuffed With Hair says:

      Me, too, Albie. I was followed all the way to the security floor of a high-rise hotel in Manhattan, and security had to intervene. And I didn’t make that up in order to justify my most egregious behavior, as a standard famewhore in the wild would do. It happened.

    • JFA says:

      God, this! Exactly! Jesus Christ, like she’s the only fucking person who deals with being a “public persona” or whatever.

      The levels of cuntitude and ignorance are just mind-blowing, really. I almost can’t take it anymore.

  32. Katie. C. says:

    I’ve had it. De-lurking for a hot minute, then going back down to the basement.
    I just posted this on her site in the comment section of the post that contained the definition of “cyber-bullying”. She won’t post it, but I don’t care. I feel comfort just knowing that she will read it. I am a numbers girl, not a writer…so please forgive my less than perfect grammar and overuse of commas. Unlike donkeyface, I do not claim to be something I am not.
    —————————————————
    Oh ! You mean like online bullying a 14 year old female singer ? Twittering to the universe that her video is the reason why “kids shouldn’t be allowed to make music videos”.. ? Would that make Rebecca Black feel anything but embarrassment & shame? Is she not putting her “art” out there just like you are claiming to do on a daily basis ?

    Like, that kind of Cyberbullying Julia ?

    Or, taking pics of random women at the airport because you disapprove of their outfits and posting their pics on your site without their permission ?

    Bolt Bus girl ? Did you have permission to post her picture on your blog after telling your twitter followers that you wanted to smash her face in ??? Is that not an “intent to cause harm” ?

    God, you are a self important asshole.

    I was a fan. Not anymore.

  33. Sausage Snappers says:

    It’s absolutely rich that the biggest bully I’ve seen on the internet is projecting her issues onto us.

  34. mcakez says:

    I do not post with my name, because I do not want to be famous on the internet. I have a real job.

    The whole ‘if you weren’t bullies, then why do you post anonymously?’ rhetoric is some painfully insipid circular reasoning. That she doesn’t see why the majority of internet users have no interest in putting their actual name out there is beyond fucking retarded.

    I am not even going to go any further with that. I just cunt the donkey today.

  35. Care Bear Stare (Pelt-a-Polozza) says:

    “Yes, please help Julia Allison prepare for her 15-minute talk”

    LOL, this is EXACTLY what I was thinking through the whole thing. Ha! That and she is planting the victim seed. She wants THIS to be posted ahead of the post of all the shitty things she’s done hoping it will garner sympathy and exhaust any reader before getting to the huge list of shitty things she’s done over the years.

    (I love run on sentences!)

  36. Live Dependently says:

    It’s easy for Julia to put her name out there attached to any stupid thing she writes or thinks. She doesn’t have to worry about finding the type of long term employment that actually pays enough for someone to survive. I know she thinks she’s an independent person, but little gifts of $10,000 and discount condo rents aren’t something everyone has available to them. If it’s between two candidates in a job search many employers are going to go for the one with a clean internet record. Of course as a social media expert she understands this. If she were someone who needed to find a job as a teacher, social worker, sales person, whatever, she’d be more careful with her own identification.

    Contacting someone’s family or their employer is wrong. It’s wrong if someone from this site does it and it was also wrong when Julia, her father and/or Emily Rose did it, by whatever medium they may have. However, whether or not she considers herself a public figure a newspaper column is a publicly available product and readers of any publication printing her dribble have the right to complain about it. Readers often complain about newspaper content and this practice is not anything remotely similar to harassment or bullying.

    • Donksers says:

      Emily Rose is creepy. I remember the drunken text she sent right around the closing of RBNS in which she reminded Julia just how “loyal” she is to her beloved donkey.

  37. New Year New You says:

    You know what would be really funny, take the site down for a week so that everyone is left going “Uh, what’s she talking about? What site?”

    Also, let’s now all open anonymous twatter accounts and send her love tweets.

    @juliaallison YOU GO GURL!
    @juliaallison LOVE YOUR WORK
    @juliaallison Jack is such a lucky man.
    @juliaallison You are the best writer in the world LOVE your column.
    @juliaallison Pink is my favorite color too!!!!!
    @juliaallison You are so skinny and your hair almost looks real!
    @juliaallison Your dad is hot!
    @juliaallison Your dog looks really happy! You must take great care of her! Love you.

    • Helena (Genuinely Curious) says:

      I love the idea about taking the site down for a week. I of course understand why people wouldn’t want that, but damn it’s a funny thought.

      • Again, Feel Free to Relax says:

        Oh, I think it would be wonderful. She would shrivel like the Wicked Witch of the West with a bucket of BPC thrown on her.

    • donkwalkofshame says:

      this tickeled me beyond: “@juliaallison You are so skinny and your hair almost looks real!”

      ahahahah

      • Big Head Fraud & the Blondsters says:

        OT, non-related, same-shit, different-channel moment today; I tuned in to Dr. Phil just in time to hear these broads going at it:

        Blond: “You’re just jealous of me!”
        Brunette: “Jealous? Oh puh-leeze! My extensions are longer than yours!”

  38. Cake Liar says:

    I can see her ego and arrogance growing daily due to her relationship with Jack McCain, and I find it utterly hilarious. What will be left of her when it all implodes? I don’t think they allow glasses wearing, hugging the suicidal dog, stinky Juicy tracksuit wearing 4am webcams in mental health institutions.

    And now she’s lying about the cease and desist letters! How much more wacko is she going to get? I agree with Loren, this is by far the best site on the internet. I lurk every day, I don’t comment much but I feel proud to have a distance learning supported Donkey PHD, I use my knowledge and skills gained all the time to remind myself how not to live, how not to behave and most importantly, how not to shovel on the spackle.

    Don’t let her shit in your litterbox, kitties, she’s just trying to stir things up for some new material at SXSW. Her self awareness has really hit an all time low, even by her standards.

    • Chola from Wilmette says:

      I lurk every day too and also use this site to remind me how NOT to be. When I was younger, I was somewhat self absorbed till life smacked me across the face. Every now and then I have moments where I almost fall into my old ways but then I come here and see Donkey’s latest bray and remind myself that is not the person I want to be at 30.

    • Donksers says:

      So true about her ego and arrogance going off the charts ever since JACK MCCAIN SON OF JOHN MCCAIN became her boyfriend. It’s disgusting, but she’ll come crashing back down to earth when Jack finally sees the light.

      • JFA says:

        I agree also. She’s an even bigger cunt now, and I didn’t think it was possible! If she gets a ring she’s going to be just fucking horrendous. I really pity her family.

        • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

          I don’t. They enabled her assholian behavior and general cuntiness.

  39. jpa says:

    I’m pretty sure that most people that contact her real life “friends” ect., are not the people on this site. Almost everyone who has a blog gets mean comments ect., probably more if you suck. The people that are doing that type of thing are who she’s typecasting anyone who disagrees with her as a “bully.”

    Also, Julia, you’re right, unless you change your entire personality completely and spend every day of the rest of your life repenting for the shit you’ve done, I won’t like you. NPD sucks doesn’t it?

  40. Jacy says:

    People are making some really good points on there, and she really can’t answer them.

    • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

      Because it ruins her narrative of being mocked and bullied because we’re jealous of her, not because she’s a malignant asshole who has done far worse to others than has ever been done to her.

      I still giggle at how she used to mock “fat” girls behind their backs, when she hasn’t exactly kept a svelte figure. And looks like hell with her aged face and cutrate Barbie doll hair. Bret Michaels’ hair-attached-to-bandanna looks better and more realistic.

      • Jacy says:

        You know what would impress me? If she acknowledged those “eight” dick moves, and apologized for them. The cuntiest thing she did recently was explain away that awful e-mail to REDACTED2’s fiancee by saying the woman had a right to know, which was such total shite on every level. Why doesn’t she do a post acknowledging how creepy her behavior was for years regarding that guy, and how disrespectful it was to his new girlfriend, and genuinely apologize to them for the way she scared them and freaked them out?

        The fact that she will never, ever admit to doing anything wrong and just brushes her vile deeds away with a “that was years ago! no one cares!” or suggests she was doing her victims a favor is precisely why people “hate” her. And why she has earned that reaction.

        • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

          She never will, because she’s mentally ill and will never hit rock bottom, because she has enablers who are as batshit crazy as she is and nobody sane who cares enough to help her.

        • Boomerang Slam says:

          Yes. THIS.

        • Again, Feel Free to Relax says:

          That’s the main reason why I moved from “fan” to “hater.” Everyone makes mistakes and does shit they aren’t proud of. I don’t really want to argue the point of whether or not she should be putting online what she does, because that’s a whole other discussion that has been fleshed out very nicely in this thread. But what really turned me was the fact that she is not and has never been a victim. If she were smart and intelligent and confident, she would own her behavior. The victimization and the constant justifications of her behavior, instead of an apology and an attempt to change were too much.

          • Aggressively Stupid says:

            Same. I used to follow her with genuine interest. What turned me off was her constant refusal to admit that anything is ever her fault. Even in an average person’s life they are bound to screw up from time to time, but to hear Donkey talk about it she’s never messed up ever and if something went wrong it was someone else’s fault.

        • Donksers says:

          Those weren’t eight “dick moves” she did. Those were eight heinous batshit insane psycho moves. Dick moves are what she does all day, every day…standard fare for Julia Allison.

    • Cake Liar says:

      I agree Jacy, as always the standard of commenting on here is absolutely brilliant. To admit any liability for her behaviour would be so overwhelming for her, she would crumble. She knows that. She is trying to cling onto whatever fantasy she can create and maintain, because she honestly doesn’t know how to even begin going in the right direction.

      Another thing I noticed when looking at the pdf of the cease and desist letter – the wording of it clearly states that damage has been done to Miss Allison and NonSociety. NonSociety – the business that became a ‘hobby’ recently. I’m certain she’s portrayed its’ demise to her father as being not her fault at all, it’s all down to the jealous haters sabotaging it. It’s obvious that she makes massive attempts to manipulate the truth and cover up her failings, and Dadsers seems to fall for it every single time. Anyway, that’s just a small thing in the grand scheme of things, and it’s probably been discussed before, I just wanted to bring it up in light of her now lying about the cease and desist letters.

      • Cake Liar says:

        Oh no wait, she’s admitting them now on her ‘hobby’ site. Let the legalese unfold!

        • juliaspublicist cried his rhinestone off juliaspublicist says:

          It’s just bullshit. We here never claimed that it was her father doing the phone call harassing. We ascertained it was either Julia directly or someone who is doing Julia’s bidding, most likely Emily Rose. She has admitted that she knows who was harassing random people in the past.

          “He sent cease and desist letters to individuals whose IP addresses we had identified as being part of the online hate site. If they were not involved, it shouldn’t be an issue.”

          Um. . . when you receive creepy calls or faxes at your employers office when you are not involved with writing this site, then, yes, IT IS AN ISSUE. A HUGE ISSUE.

          And how did she get IP’s. Did WordPress release them, because I have poured over their legal policies, and it appears that you have to do A LOT of legal wrangling to get that information. And if they did indeed get it, how come she accused the wrong person? I myself have never been contact personally.

          • Brianna says:

            So. I guess if the ‘haters’ contact her employers, boyfriends etc. And she’s not really doing anything disturbing or wrong, by that reasoning it shouldn’t be an issue, right?

            Logic, ur doin it rong.

          • Fred Grott says:

            JP, I once was accused of a computer break-in..

            According to my lawyer advice..all request from LEs for IP information has to be followed up by a 30 to 60 day legal notice to the accused that the IP info was given out..thus normally its always by court oder as it has the accused notified in case they want to counter charge..

            Someone could lose their bar license if its too much ethical going over the line even before something illegal..Jules should read the ethical code of the IL Bar Association..

      • Jacy "Donk" LaRue Jacy "Donk" LaRue says:

        I know of two people who contacted Dadsers, by the way. You know who they were? The two people who were harassed the most frighteningly at work — one with the phone call from Jack McCain’s lawyer, the other with relentless e-mail threats, and the person to whom Donkey acknowledged that she knew who was behind the harassment.

        And since Dadsers was serving as Donk’s representative during that bullshit and sending e-mails and cease-and-desist letters to the wrong people, why exactly should these victims of Julia and her “friend” not contact her lawyer? Especially when she told one of them that she knew who was behind the harassment? They did her a favor by contacting Dadsers — both of them would have been justified in calling the cops.

        • Handbag Stuffed With Hair says:

          As I’ve said to you and JP, Jacy, not outing ourselves is the best thing for the mods. We should really keep it that way for now, I think?

          And Peter Baugher, Esq? Should you be reading this, the very best way you can protect your daughter is to face whatever is in yourself that won’t let you admit that your life is a lie. Do you feel it in the morning, right before you are fully awake, a sense of dread? It was all went very fast, didn’t it? And you were probably better than the life you chose for yourself. You recall yourself as being better, anyway, and how could a man of such astonishing privilege amount to something so terribly mediocre? Tis a mystery. You have a son who is a first-rate achiever, but as angry as anyone I’ve ever seen caught candidly. A wounded wife your mother despises. And a daughter who behaves as if she neither has a conscience or a functioning intellect and who will never, ever live an independent life. She’s going to get it from you or she’s going to get it from your mother or she will steal it from her mother if you die first. Best case scenario she marries and divorces well, marries better, works her way up to a brittle, provincial dreamscape. And THEN you will die happily, maybe? I hope so, one parent of a grown daughter to another. I think of you sometimes when my own mirror is hard to face. My crimes are all my own, but when I turn and look at my daughter I see something holy, something superior to me in every way. Imagine how that feels. Come after me if you’d like. I’m always open for a conversation.

        • DonkeyPunch says:

          Jacy, I just left her a comment letting her know that I was the person harassed at work by ‘Yack’s lawyer’ and that all of this happened the very same week as dadsers letters and that I had never commented on the site, much less had something to do with running RBNS. I ‘liked’ the Free RBNS page and my name was googled and I was contacted and threatened. I was also clear that the reason I contacted her father directly was because I needed an adult, rationale response, not blaming “crazed hacker fans” and an invitation to have coffee with her.

          I guess we’ll see if she approves it…

          • Handbag Stuffed With Hair says:

            So you’re saying your IP address was acquired through Facebook? Huh.

          • JFA says:

            As a lawyer I’m absolutely beyond disgusted at these tactics. It’s worse than an ambulance chaser. Jesus. Shady ass fucks, the Baughers.

          • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

            I wonder what the Illinois State Bar would have to say about these tactics.

            Frankly, if I’d been harassed by the Donkey and her father, I’d be looking into how to get him in trouble with the state bar.

          • juliaspublicist cried his rhinestone off juliaspublicist says:

            According to a quick scan. She didn’t approve it. Hmm. . . .

          • Julia's Rough Opening says:

            I suggested a while ago that those harassed by PB look into filing a complaint with the Illinois ethics board for his SLAPP tactics.

    • Sausage Snappers says:

      Someone took my point that if she doesn’t like what we have to say she should stfu and implied that I think women in short skirts deserve to be raped. I just kant.

      • Brianna says:

        Yes, because saying mean things is totally like an appalling physical violation!

      • Brianna says:

        Also, in this case it is more like suggesting the woman who is whoohooing in a miniskirt, hooker heels and bikini top (with cutlets!) on a street corner, while dry humping a lamp post, shouldn’t be surprised at the catcalls and looks of disgust from the passing public.

  41. Frequent Liar Miles says:

    “But how long will you remain in the shadows, deriving pleasure by hurting someone else?”

    Forever, perhaps. We’re not going anywhere, in case you haven’t noticed.

    • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

      As long as she not only remains an unrepentant cunt, but continues to hurt others.

    • Admiral of the Burro Fleet says:

      It’s not overcast today at all, Julia. Why did you think I would be in shadows? I’m genuinely curious.

  42. I didn’t read all the rambling. I stopped at “bated” breath and was impressed she didn’t fuck that up with “baited” instead.

    Julia, I always post under my own name here and in your comment section (which never get posted. Ho hum.)

    I comment because I have an overpowering urge to call a douche a douche. It’s really as simple as that.

    It’s like when you’re watching a ball game and say “Wow! What a catch! Did you see that? Amazing!” to those around you – people you don’t even know. It’s a shared experience. Same thing with you. There is the urge to say “Wow! What a cunt! Did you see what she did? Amazing! I didn’t know humans could act like that!”

    I would refer to myself as a hobbyist and not a harasser. If I were to harass you, I’d be pulling all the gay stunts you and Daddy pulled recently. I’d say this site is more like a hobby – but instead of a collection of stamps or coins, it is a collection of all your ridiculous bullshit and cunty moves. Because you really take it to a whole new level. You are, to put it mildly, a professional cunt. And people love to see the pros play, be it baseball or being a gigantic lunatic twat.

  43. OK – just read the rest of your rambling and I have one remark Julia – yes, your father does seem gay now that you mention it.

    Not that there’s anything wrong with it.

    • Albie Quirky says:

      I have no idea why you think that a sixty-year-old gym bunny who’s BFF with Paul “Kloset Kase” Kirk seems gay. Just because he wears makeup tinted foundation.

  44. AllDayBray says:

    Julia Allison Baugher, you silly, self-absorbed cupcake…

    Don’t you understand that the only reason anyone has access to this information to comment on it to begin with is because YOU TELL US! On Twitter, on Facebook, on the ridiculous shillfest of a blog you call a business…you pour your life into the public sphere and do it proudly.

    Yet you insist we love all of it. If anyone criticizes you, then that is BULLYING. You invoke the protections of a private person while relying on the perks of publicity to maintain the fraud that is your life.

    That’s pretty much it, OH, also Georgetown, Hoya, columnist, fired, plagiarize, plagiarism, plagiarized, affair, grapefruit, mediabistro, macbook air, McCain

  45. Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

    the link julia posted to StopBullying.gov actually leads to StopBullying.org. not the same site! well done julesie well done.

    • juliaspublicist cried his rhinestone off juliaspublicist says:

      It sickens me that she got bullying content FROM READING HERE.

    • Big Head Fraud & the Blondsters says:

      What a dumb donkey!

      I almost wish for your comment & subsequent response(s) to be deleted so she doesn’t read it here & catch on, cuz you know, if & when she got called out on it tomorrow during her rant, she’d say her haterz hacked her site.

  46. flatface says:

    I just bully her because I think all her albums suck since she left Blake Babies. I mean that first album with Lemonheads was okay, but then she totally became a sell-out. Wait… What? Maybe I’m on the wrong website.

  47. Albie Quirky says:

    Joolzballz, if you were serious about stopping bullying, you’d stop bullying people yourself.

    You don’t. You just want people to stop bullying you.

    • juliaspublicist cried his rhinestone off juliaspublicist says:

      This is the hilarious part. She says this is now her “cause.” OF COURSE her “cause” is something that directly affects her. Not how it works, Donks.

    • Barking Mad says:

      She doesn’t care about real bullying. To her it’s just another way to get attention and maybe make some money.

  48. LetItExplode says:

    I love how the whole “eight or so examples of me being a dick” comes from Jacy’s bullying post and includes:

    *Harassing an ex’s new fiancee via the meanest email many of us have ever seen
    *Revealing another ex’s mental illness on GAWKER
    *Slandering business partners
    *Cheating
    *Plagiarizing
    And
    *Threatening strangers with physical violence

    But that’s not really the TRUE Julia, bunnies! Don’t take it so seriously! Again, feel free to relax!

  49. Princess WideStance says:

    Julia likes to use the lowest common denominators as her examples. What about the really smart, witty, accomplished people here who make well-reasoned criticisms? That’s like 90% of this site. Why doesn’t respond to that?

    She kant do it.

    She’s trying to present her haters as a bunch of mentally disturbed trolls. Well, I’m sure a few of us are. Most of us are not at all.

  50. LetItExplode says:

    Julia: you are not being bullied. You are being called out on your shitty behavior. How do you not see the difference?

  51. flatface says:

    Prediction: she mentions this site at Austin, our page hits go through the roof.

    Neither she nor her father are familar with the Streisand Effect.

    • New Year New You says:

      She will never say Reblogging DONK out loud.

      “Hai hai, people at SXSW, I have haterz at mah hate site Reblogging Donk.” People would laugh out loud.

      • Meg says:

        Yeah, but when you google “Julia Allison Hate Site”(sight/cite) Reblogging Donk is the 4th result – after 2 Gawker posts and Guest of a Guest. It’ll be pretty easy for people to figure out which is the current hate site/sight/cite and which is from the days of yore.

      • Blinky, Fat, Flapping Fuck - You Shitheads! says:

        I’d pay to hear her tell people that we refer to her as a donkey.

  52. Donksers says:

    Here’s what pisses me off about Julia Allison. She’s desperate to know why people can’t stand her so she keeps asking “Why all the hate?” We’ve told her over and over again in every way possible, whether it’s here at RBNS/RBD, the chat room, or her own blog’s comment section, why she is such a detestable human being. She doesn’t like what she hears so she blocks it all out and continues to play dumb about why people think she’s so vile. She refuses to look at herself honestly and take responsibility for her own fuckedup-ness. I look forward to the day when this lunatic gets her dream job of being on a reality show; the RBD comments will look like love letters in comparison to what a much larger audience of TV viewers will do to her.

    • Pink Ruffled Cheese says:

      This. She knows exactly why people continually criticize her, she just can’t bring herself to believe any of these critiques apply to her. So she does what any good narcissist would do and repurposes (or REBRANDS?!) the criticism as “bullying.”

  53. idiotbox says:

    “juliaallison 2 hours ago in reply to bostonsquirrel
    It is not “disagreeing” with someone to call them “retarded,” “hideous,” “haggard,” – to have polls on when their boyfriend will dump them, etc. That’s not disagreeing.”

    We don’t have the poll on the website anymore; I believe it’s been gone for a long, long, long while now (ain’t I right??). Someone’s been trolling us!

    • A Bit of Moxie says:

      But she never reads here!!!!!! Feel free to relax!!!!!!

    • Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

      Also, the poll question was ‘When Will Pancakes Parachute out of the Flying Donkeycopter?’ I mean, that is pretty indecipherable to a casual observer. I’m surprised Julia even understood what it meant.

    • Donksers says:

      What the hell? The bottom line is…she’s an insufferable bitch. We’re allowed to dislike her, hate her if we so choose, and shockingly enough, we can discuss it here, tell her about it directly, or leave comments about her shitty columns. End of story, DONKEY.

    • t'ots mcakez is tots mind baughling at the "Lovesong of J. Alpelt Thrufroque" says:

      Again, these kinds of polls are commonplace with people who seek celebrity. Hell, they are commonplace with people who don’t, but accidentally gain public attention. She can’t claim this is unsought attention, and therefore she can’t just say, “Pay attention to me, but don’t criticize.”

      THAT IS NOT HOW THE WORLD WORKS, PRINCESS.

      I know I’ve mentioned that I teach high school. That tiny little spotlight has made me a target of bullying, threats, verbal harassment, gossip, and online criticism and rating (there are sites for this!) Do I get all uppity and demand my students stop using the internet and freedom of speech to stop saying things about me? No. That isn’t how free speech works! People are going to criticize; get used to it!

      • t'ots mcakez is tots mind baughling at the "Lovesong of J. Alpelt Thrufroque" says:

        Oh, parents have also complained to my principal (her daughter got an F because she got suspending during finals week and chose not to go to the school holding room to take her finals, and a mother said I ‘call too much’ to inform her when her child is failing classes and has broken school rules, which is, um, part of my contract), thereby dragging my employers into it.

        OMG, Jules, we are, like, the same! Except for the fact that I just get back on the horse and continue doing the right thing, and the fact that most people actually like me.

        And I have a job.

        So really, nothing alike.

    • pelts, glorious pelts says:

      I’m bostonsquirrel!!

      I’m a long, long time lurker and I honestly didn’t think she’d post any of my comments. She didn’t post my final comment, asking how she felt about her own history of bullying (especially that girl who’s music video she trashed on twitter the other day) since she has more influence and reach than the average person. Of course she did not post or respond to that.

  54. LetItExplode says:

    Also, holy shit, did she just wink-brag about a guy who’s not her boyfriend’s sexual prowess?

    All class, as always.

  55. Bunburying says:

    For someone who derides cyber bulling as swiftly as she does, she sure is making a big joke out of it here, on her “best friend” Taylor Greason’s profile picture:

    http://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=613224595842&set=a.599056987842.2143913.1105481&theater.
    *
    Jeremy Neigher typically, i’d write in an insult here but you’re making it way too easy for me.
    11 January at 15:20
    *
    Julia Allison ooh oooh! A Neigher Insult!! I LIVE FOR THESE ONLINE MOMENTS. DO IT DO IT DO IT
    11 January at 15:31
    *
    Stephanie Southerland Why didn’t you mount the lion Jeremy…everyone was doing it!
    11 January at 16:17
    *
    Taylor Greason Personally, I don’t think J. Neigher is man enough to ride a housecat. All cyber bully, no action. There I said it.
    11 January at 17:01
    *
    Julia Allison I wish he would cyber bully a little more right now. C’MON NEIGHER. YOU TALK A BIG GAME, BUT VERY LITTLE ACTION.
    11 January at 17:11

    • Mini Driver says:

      It’s killing me that the donkey has a mutual friend with someone named Neigher. The jokes really are starting to write themselves.

  56. New Year New You says:

    Julia Allison, bully, harasser, stalker

    @unstatusthequo – Actually, yes, I would like some help. Let’s find out their real names – email me: julia@nonsociety.com
    7 minutes ago via web in reply to unstatusthequo

    Eh Julie, the only legal way of getting people’s IP addresses is by court order, so watch your own ethics lady.

    • New Year New You says:

      She talks so much shit:

      “He sent cease and desist letters to individuals whose IP addresses we had identified as being part of the online hate site.”

      Look you lying dumbfuck donkey you could only legally get people’s IP addresses from any website by court order. And then you would need another court order to get their personal details from their telecommunications company. So you’re either lying, or doing something corrupt. Which is it donkey?

    • Flying Donkeycopter says:

      I hope they know they will have to provide their services for free or trade for the JA shill.

    • Sausage Snappers says:

      How is finding out our names going to stop bullying? Is she gonna tattle on us? She’s off her rocker.

  57. eyegloss says:

    (Long-time lurker, occasional commenter.) The reasons I keep coming back here are, well first, because you guys are just really funny and really good writers. Jacy and JP could decide to post exclusively about the design elements of the Dodge Stratus from now on and I would still be all up in here, gettin’ my laugh on at the expense of a (really, really nice!) midsize sedan.

    About the current subject matter, though, I am genuinely curious. As a person, Julia isn’t that interesting. But as a caricature of self-obsession on the internet, she’s “fascinating.” The internet is great for communities and whatever but it’s also pretty good at facilitating narcissism. I’ll leave it to Julia to address the cultural implications of things like farmville and youtube in further depth, but in short I think a lot of the cool technology we’re using right now encourages a general lack of curiosity about anything other than oneself, and that nobody represents how ugly and dangerous that is better than the person who singlehandedly pioneered horizontal scrolling, vlogging and vlogging about your vagina, and then spread them like a modern-day Johnny Appleseed–Julia. So I come here to seek solace from that and to mock her and everybody else who thinks they should receive an award for existing.

  58. Records Custodian says:

    Julia is Veruca Salt and Nellie Olson, in this age of crass, empty, lazy fame.

    It is why good, decent people root against her. No one wants to see the spoiled, entitled bully win. No one cheers for the liar.

    People want the spoiled, entitled bully to get her comeuppance, and many will silently hope that post-comeuppance, she will be redeemed. I have to believe she will get her comeuppance eventually. I don’t root for her redemption, as I don’t believe that she has the discipline to earn it.

    Julia isn’t the worst person on the planet, but she is loud and brayful. She is persistently wretched, more persistent than the most virulent herpes strain. She stubbornly tries to pull the sickly sweet and victim thing of Nellie Olsen and it makes her all the more despicable.

    People will always root against such a person because we cannot abide that kind of person winning. It goes against the core of the belief system that only hard work, humility and decency are ultimately rewarded. Julia is the embodiment of the new age of crass, empty, unearned fame and it is a thousand kinds of repugnant. Add to that her pathological refusal to have any kind of introspection or self-awareness, together with her gleeful spilling of other people’s secrets (all while decrying her lack of privacy) and her ravenous desire for attention (of only the fawning variety), and you get a person that is not only NOT bullied in any manner, shape or form, but a person who is absolutely worthy of vociferous criticism.

    • Donksers says:

      Too bad they don’t have a speaker lined up with a rebuttal to what Julia’s going to say tomorrow in her little talk. This would be perfect, Records Custodian. It answers all of her questions about why me, why me, why me???

    • Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

      a thousand times this.

    • Eight Dollar Grapefruit says:

      as charlie sheen would say, this post is #winning

    • The extremely hungry bitchy bunny says:

      THIS!!!!!!!!! Times a million chocolate bars surreptitiously binged in a dark corner of whole foods…. plus bonus points for spot on Little House on the Prairie references.

      Ps: I cannot look away from the crazy donkey’s comments today! She is really shooting herself in the hoof by revealing the twisted logic behind her “bullying” stance. It’s equal parts nauseating and horrifically fascinating.

      • Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

        Would you walk into the nearest insane asylum and try to have a rational discussion with the people in there?

        Julia: I love sharing! Look at me! Photoshoot! Cupcakes! Hot boyfriend! Jetsetting! Love me!

        “Bullies”: How do you pay for your lavish lifestyle? Your dress and pelts are not very attractive. Didn’t you say you had learned your lesson and would not be blogging about your new relationship? Are you getting products and services for free?

        Julia: I forbid you from reading my hobby blog or looking at my photos that are posted on my public Facebook fan page! Do not question how I make money, though part of my income may derive from endorsing products and misleading my readers with non-disclosure! I love Moot from 4chan but hate online anonymity. Bullying is my rallying cry because it’s all about me me me. What, a social media story is unfolding in the Middle East?

        “Bullies”: Transparency and honesty would be nice. Many of us have met you and still didn’t like you. Consider toning down your over-the-top costumed fantasy life, focus on your professional activities if you insist on continuing to “write”, don’t treat life like living in a dollhouse, and don’t take a shit on everyone around you. The age of oversharing has ended. Get with the program and grow up.

        Julia: But I love sharing…

        “Bullies”: *FACEPALM*

        • AnnaPelt is Happy at 138 says:

          That’s another thing… I genuinely don’t get why she loves “sharing” so much. Sharing implies give-and-take. I guess “sharing” is just her social-media buzzword for “doing things that get me attention and accolades.”

        • Mini Driver says:

          I heart this comment very much. This is exactly what I imagine the inside of Julie’s head looks like, holding a buffet of half-baked thoughts that should be indigestible when consumed together. She reminds me of people I’ve argued with in the past who believe that the Whitman line about being vast and containing multitudes gives them license to become a font of cognitive dissonance.

    • t'ots mcakez is tots mind baughling at the "Lovesong of J. Alpelt Thrufroque" says:

      She is the anti Horatio Alger story.

      Regardless, I think I am going to take a step back from the observation of her constructed life, for a while. She is boring, really, and hating her has become as mundane as her own life must be. Also, since we are her only audience, I feel like it would be good to offer reprieve from the watchful eyes for which she begs.

      They say that if you aren’t part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

      Consider this my mini-Lent.

      See y’all in chat, where she really doesn’t matter. (Apparently there is nu-cu-ler type drama happening to the browns? Who knew!? Someone ask JA her opinion. I will come back in a week or two to read her response.)

  59. EDENT says:

    No matter how bitchy she is, hateful she is, stupid she is, mean she is, moronic she is……. I would still fuck the shit out of her.

  60. Admiral of the Burro Fleet says:

    Woof! She’s going full donkey right now. Threatening to bypass subpoenas to extract IP addresses (…how?), blaughing some shit about how pomelos make her cry? Burro needs a tranq, stat.

    • Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

      is she seriously, SERIOUSLY, insinuating that she is some wretched child we forcefully keep miserable for our own happiness?! what a loon!
      she links to this story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ones_Who_Walk_Away_from_Omelas

      • Big Head Fraud & the Blondsters says:

        ‘…a single unfortunate child dog be kept in perpetual filth, darkness and misery…’

        There ya go, Donkey, I fixed that for ya!

        #Lilly_is_the_ONLY_victim_here

      • t'ots mcakez is tots mind baughling at the "Lovesong of J. Alpelt Thrufroque" says:

        Me thinks she doesn’t get that story.

        At all.

        Also, she should just roll over and die for comparing herself.

        Next up: “Harrison Baugheron: Persecution for Equality in a World Where You Are so Tiny and Cute!”

  61. New Year New You says:

    Also Julia, can I just say, that I find the fact that you’re sitting in a Hilton going “wah wah poor me, so bullied, hard life, I’ve had a bad day”, when right now there are thousands of people in Japan who have just had their lives completely destroyed, fucking disgusting.

    You don’t know what hate is, you don’t know what bullying is, and you certainly don’t know what suffering is. Go take another picture of pink dress and shut the fuck up.

  62. Julia's Too Small Tutu says:

    Doing all this “I’m a victim” shit in the wake of actual tragedies in the world (the earthquakes in New Zealand and Japan and the situation in Libya) is especially crass, even for her. She wouldn’t know real victimhood if it bit her on her ass.

    • virgil reid says:

      i was thinking the same thing. i wish i could comment on her stupid pity part of victimization and tell her to shut the fuck up.

  63. reformed says:

    Jesus. I can’t deal with this. Julia, seriously, do you possess any common sense?

    “here’s the deal”: I have been bullied on the Internet. and no, it’s not fun. I’ve since left the forums that were the source of my “cyber bullying” or whatever and it’s been nearly three years and I still get about a fun little formspring jab or fb message/ email what have you reminding me of my past embarrassments or stupid things I said and did. well, hey, guess what. I was a teenager at the time but eventually, I took a step BACK. I started spending less time online. when I realized that my blog that I kept full of pretty personal things was being spread around as light reading for some mean spirited people, I locked it down. I did a reevaluation and am much more protective of what I put online. i came to the (groundbreaking, I know) realization that I would never change these peoples opinions about me and that the only thing I COULD change was me. since then, I’m still active on various social media platforms and am much, much happier because i don’t have to deal with the consequences of actions I’m no longer making.

    they made me cry numerous times and the comments I received on goofy videos (think “lip dubbing” but much less tragic since I was SIXTEEN not 29) hurt a lot, but even at 16 I had the presence of mind to understand that since I had put it out there for anyone to see, I had put it out there for anyone to have an opinion about, and therefore, articulate that opinion in turn.

    it’s not complicated.

    I would never discourage someone from taking an anti-bullying standpoint. I don’t see how that could do anyone any harm, but I think Julia should realize that she’s not going to become the face of this cause. upper class white girls that post their every move on the internet are easy targets, and they’re not in the group of bullied folks that are victims because the focus of the bullying is on things that are out of the victims control. Julia Allison, by taking cyber bullying on as your cause you are making a mockery of something that IS a real cause. your plight may hurt you, but it is the quintessential definition of a “white girl problem”. it is not beyond your level of comprehension to understand it, so listen when I say that

    • Frequent Liar Miles says:

      This was good. I would even say nuanced.

    • Sausage Snappers says:

      This. Fellow “victim” of forum bullying, too. Cried many many times. But I learned from it, bucked up, and moved on to be a more responsible internet user.

  64. reformed says:

    Jesus. I can’t deal with this. Julia, seriously, do you possess any common sense?

    “here’s the deal”: I have been bullied on the Internet. and no, it’s not fun. I’ve since left the forums that were the source of my “cyber bullying” or whatever and it’s been nearly three years and I still get the occasional formspring jab or fb message/ email what have you reminding me of my past embarrassments or stupid things I said and did a couple times a month. well, hey, guess what. I was a teenager at the time but eventually, I took a step BACK. I started spending less time online. when I realized that my blog that I kept full of pretty personal things was being spread around as light reading for some mean spirited people, I locked it down. I did a reevaluation and am much more protective of what I put online. i came to the (groundbreaking, I know) realization that I would never change these peoples opinions about me and that the only thing I COULD change was me. since then, I’m still active on various social media platforms and am much, much happier because i don’t have to deal with the consequences of actions I’m no longer making.

    they made me cry numerous times and the comments I received on goofy videos (think “lip dubbing” but much less tragic since I was SIXTEEN not 29) hurt a lot, but even at 16 I had the presence of mind to understand that since I had put it out there for anyone to see, I had put it out there for anyone to have an opinion about, and therefore, articulate that opinion in turn.

    it’s not complicated.

    I would never discourage someone from taking an anti-bullying standpoint. I don’t see how that could do anyone any harm, but I think Julia should realize that she’s not going to become the face of this cause. upper class white girls that post their every move on the internet are easy targets, and they’re not in the group of bullied folks that are victims because the focus of the bullying is on things that are out of the victims control. Julia Allison, by taking cyber bullying on as your cause you are making a mockery of something that IS a real cause. your plight may hurt you, but it is the quintessential definition of a “white girl problem”. it is not beyond your level of comprehension to understand it, so listen when I say that you taking on cyber bullying is doing a disservice to the cause. there are real kids out there being bullied literally to death for things about themselves they cannot control. this is in your control. stop now. you’re embarrassing yourself.

    • someproblems says:

      Slow claps! This was wonderful. Thank you for sharing.

    • jpa says:

      The thing is, Julia isn’t taking an “anti-bullying” standpoint. She’s taking a “people criticize me and I don’t like it” standpoint. Her claiming to be bullied, in itself, it a mockery to people who actually ARE. It’s just her NPD raging out of control because she can’t stand people thinking she’s not tiny and cute.

      • Big Head Fraud & the Blondsters says:

        “It’s just her NPD raging out of control because she can’t stand people thinking she’s not tiny and cute.”

        I don’t think that’s it. Close, but not quite.

        Donkey desperately needs for FlapJack & Mrs. Nutterworth et al to disbelieve every unfavorable thing written about her online. The only way she can envision getting out of having her hooves held to the fire & facing accountability for any/all of her atrocious behavior is to umbrella her ugly lies (& even uglier truths) under the shroud of victim status.

        • jpa says:

          eh, its my opinion that she truly believes that she’s a victim. She lives in a distorted reality. While I do think that she’s cleaning up her internet past for Pancakes, I do not for one second believe that she’s taking any accountability or considering that anything less than adoration could be true.

        • Big Head Fraud & the Blondsters says:

          If it’s not that we’re saying the same thing, just differently, we’re not that far apart on this, IMHO.

          I think Donkey expects the end result will be, (once Dad$er & RepDef muck up behind her), that the obvious conclusion is foregone & but one:
          She’s tiny & cute! Nothing else matters, right?

          In the romcom scenario playing in her head, as long as everything that turns up on a background check can be attributed to the haterz, Donkey is golden, right?

          If she’d direct all this energy wasted on scheming into actually changing into a decent person, she’d be so much better off.

  65. Pink Ruffled Cheese says:

    Perhaps a better speech title would have been: “Who or What is a Julia Allison?”

    I visit and post on this because Julia is entertaining, however unintentionally. And I post under a pseudonym because who I am is none of Julia’s business, much in the same I wish she’d realize that who she is none of our business either.

    Hope that helps! 🙂 😉 🙂 😉 🙂 😉 :-0

    • Pink Ruffled Cheese says:

      *much in the same WAY

      It’s hard to type in this dark basement with such fat fingers. 🙁

  66. someproblems says:

    Julie — I have commented on your online antics since you clawed your way onto Gawker.

    1) I do NOT hate you. I actually kind of love you. You’re fucking insane and you want everyone to know it. I find this fascinating!

    2) In all of this time I have NEVER commented on your work on other websites than the ones pointing and laughing at what a tool you are (or pretending to be via your online reality soap opera starring you, fabulous you!). I have NEVER emailed you, I have NEVER started fake Twitter accounts to harass you and I have NEVER written anyone associated with you. NOT ONE SINGLE TIME. And I assure you I never will because that’s unpleasant and uncool. You should feel free to ignore this website and I don’t approve of people reaching out to you just to be mean.

    3) I don’t consume your online segments or your writing because I find your work to be at a high school level and I respect myself too much to submit myself to substandard work.

    4) On the other hand, I am totally addicted to the online soap opera you put on everyday. It’s amazing in all its trashy Erica Kane make-up gun set to 11. That is a product I can get behind.

    I agree that it’s shitty that some people who laugh at your own personal soap opera feel the need to reach out into your life. They are probably your super fans, like the people writing Susan Lucci letters telling her they love her or hate her or whatever.

    If you want it to stop, cancel that brilliant trash-fest that is you online soap opera lifecast. You won’t because you are too fond of boasting and creating circumstances that make it look like you are more accomplished, wealthy, loved and attractive than you are. You’re like a younger version of Keeping Up Appearances — it’s Bower, not Bogger!

    I justify this small habit of tuning into your crazy anonymously because I actually have a career and reputation to protect. If anyone knew I was a superfan of yours, I’d be embarrassed for having such low-brow tastes. I run with a pretty smart set of people most of whom don’t even watch tv, let alone consume online personal reality show soap opera drama.

    I would have no problem stating these opinions with my real name attached if your online tv show were less tacky. Sorry. It’s not personal. I just like laughing at your online show.

    It’s like if I liked Taylor Swift (I don’t!), I would never tell my friends because they would think I had lost my marbles.

    I don’t think I know who you are and I really hope you aren’t at all like the person you play online, because she is kind of gross.

  67. JFA says:

    Wow, responding to a newspaper article by commenting on it is harassment now? I didn’t learn about that in law school! I hope they updated their curriculum.

  68. Prof. F Camping, Doctor of Donkology says:

    so donk finally got some PR people to represent her for free, huh?
    http://www.mediabistro.com/prnewser/julia-allison-hires-her-first-pr-agency_b17188

    • New Year New You says:

      But wait, she’s not a celebrity right, so why does she need a PR? What backstreet columnist needs a PR? And I doubt Susan Blond is giving free services.

      • Albie Quirky says:

        Momser and Dadser are bankrolling it in the hope of the Flapjacks Strategy paying off. Otherwise they will have to continue to support her ass forever.

  69. diluted brain says:

    I barely glanced her comments since she bores me. This community entertains me, not her.
    I must say, personally – I was never bullied in my life. I lead a happy life (married recently, new job, plan to start a family, etc). So her little hypotheses are kind of off. Just because people find you dumb, tacky, classless, a laughing stock, and cluess doesn’t make them haters or bullies. It just makes us realists.

    • I'm guessing it's biolgy says:

      It just makes us people with opinions! How about that?! Different people…different opinions! Can she fathom that we all might not agree on the particular comments made, but, in the grand scheme, have found a community we enjoy?

      Remember when, in chat, she was in her ‘authenticity’ mood, and commented that this site keeps her from lying?

      She wants to be a victim. End of story. It’s the only ‘avenue’ left for her. Bonne chance, my dear.

      • I'm guessing it's biology says:

        By the way, you’re a symbol, Julia. It’s not you, Baugher. It’s what you seemingly embrace and put forward that brings me to my keyboard to type out comments to other people that aren’t you.

        I’m guessing it’s biology?!

    • Sausage Snappers says:

      This. And I was bullied in middle school but that’s not why I bully her. There really is nothing to psycho-analyze here. She’s an internet reality show that I’m throwing popcorn at. We just don’t like you, hon!

  70. You Pay with Yo' Face! says:

    Another kid physically bullied and now dead because of a self-inflicted gun wound. http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/03/anti-gay-bullying-leads-to-another-tragic-teen-suicide/

    It’s not difficult for me to imagine Julia beginning tomorrow’s self-pitying brayfest by holding up this article, reading the first few lines, lighting a candle, and asking for a moment of silence. And next? “This could have been me!”

  71. ICrayAnAwfulLotLately says:

    No one needs to read this, but I needed to write it.
    Like the majority of people here, I have never once written to Julia Allison Baugher, phoned her, spoken to her in person, or @ tweeted her. Likewise, I have never approached in any way anyone in her circle of enablers. If she knows of me at all, it is only because she has actively pursued this site.
    I do not hate Julia Allison Baugher; I certainly do not bully her. I do, however, despise the impoverished value system that equates privilege with entitlement. I am sickened by wilful ignorance, superficiality, arrogance, rudeness, selfishness, and greed. I am not tricked by deliberate obfuscation. I do not confuse notoriety with merit. I abhor grasping sycophantic climbers. And I am unmoved by lazy grifters, strategic manipulators, and transparent posers.
    Perhaps it’s just coincidence that the avalanche of material Julia Allison Baugher herself posts online — which is all most of us have to go by — portrays her as the personification of virtually every one of these loathsome characteristics. I certainly find myself aghast, time and again, at her shocking range and yet, predictability … and I doubt she is capable of appreciating the nuances of that contradiction here.
    I don’t owe her my name, address, or phone number. I’ve never asked for hers.
    I haven’t signed up for every free app online in order to relentlessly mark my territory all over the web and then try to sell that collection of URLs as my “personal brand” in a quest for “fuck you money”; it is absolutely inconceivable to me. There is no-one in my life who has ever ignited such desperation, or who inspired such inferiority that I would fashion my entire life into a campaign to shout “fuck you” at them in the end, as if that was some kind of victory. And honestly, I ask you, does the hypocrisy of these self-righteous elitist “Christians” never cease?
    My life is none of Julia Allison Baugher’s business and I’ve never asked her to make it so. The outer limits of the boundaries I set for personal privacy are mine to determine, not hers, and the details of my life are not for sale, not for love or money.
    Is this why she is so obsessed with hatred for the community of people here? And why her father willingly used his professional credentials to threaten participants here? Because we’ve got nothing to lose or to gain from this? Does that enrage them? Their lives, measured out by materialistic status markers, short-circuit with jealousy at our unfettered freedom, why, to them we must be practically communist I guess.
    Honestly? Why are they SO obsessed? Why do you think that is? I’m genuinely curious.
    Ha! xo puppies
    P.S. Where the hell is Lily? I can’t bear to think too much about that poor bedraggled little pup because it truly gives me the serious sads. But WTF?

  72. Ba Donka DONK says:

    Donkey, I don’t participate in harassment or bullying. However, I do use the critical thinking part of my brain and my educated opinions and voice to criticize public figures – from politicians, to reality show contestants, to syndicated columnists.

    If you didn’t want an audience, why did you “found” lifecasting, go on the cover of a major magazine as the epitome of “Internet fame,” or the billion other stunts you pulled to be the type of person who would be asked to speak at conferences (as you so proudly tout?)

    Sorry if you don’t like your audience’s reaction – that happens.

    And I chose to remain anonymous b/c I’m quite purposely *not* a public figure and have no desire to be HARASSED by your cadre of “private investigators” and gay lawyers.

  73. JFA says:

    I really just cannot. Honestly she makes me sick to my stomach at this point. I come back because I love you all but…I don’t know for how much longer I can stand her. She’s just so vile.

  74. renee says:

    Exciting day at RBNS/RBD. Your God acknowledged your renewed existence, you miserable wretches.

    • AllDayBray says:

      HI JULIA

    • LEFOOLIEH says:

      STOP CYBERBULLYING! Leave that to your “god”. Ew.

    • Admiral of the Burro Fleet says:

      YOU ARE FORBIGGEN FROM READING HERE! I FORBIG YOU!

    • New Year New You says:

      You called us miserable wretches! THAT IS DEFAMATION! WE WILL HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS! WE WILL HAVE TO GIVE A 15 MINUTE SPEECH ABOUT YOU TOMORROW, YOU MOTHERFUCKIN’ HATER.

      • stop your (donkey) sobbing says:

        I am preparing my speech right now. I am so very busy. I do not have time to answer your questions. Maybe you could help me?

    • Lily's Rage Virus says:

      CARE BEAR STARE.

    • ICrayAnAwfulLotLately says:

      It is the hilarious exchanges like this, I must say, that keep me coming back to this site. You’re all so ineffably tiny & cute.

    • Albie Quirky says:

      I’m not the one who gave a panel to an audience of three.

      SMARTY’S PARTY WHAT WHAT

  75. Donksers says:

    Stupid donkey is trying her damnedest to get as much mileage as possible out of the fact that just a few people (I would imagine it’s very few) have contacted family/friends/employers. She’s making a huge deal out of it because she knows that’s the best way to get people to side with her. If she just complains about haters making mean comments on a hate site, a lot of people are going to say, “ho hum, whatever.” So now her angle is to get support by grossly exaggerating the incidents of personal contacts that have taken place. She’s going to repeat this until she can make it look like haters messing with her life, up-close-and-personal, is a rampant, daily activity, even though she knows that is patently false. Oh, and the other thing she’s using to try and get traction is the tweet asking if her dad is gay. She’s outraged by that…how could anyone be so bold and so rude?!! But announcing to the world via twitter that her mother had been raped? No problem.

  76. Forbidden Peltskank says:

    I vote for cutting her loose right now. Who needs her and I refuse to give her material to try and capitalise on.

    Let’s indeed never the donkey (again).

    • HipsterLawyerGrifter says:

      Tbh, I come here for the community and the quick wit of the commenters, not to follow Jabs. I would probably be just as happy, as someone else illustrated above with the car example, with open posts and posts about current events and other things on the internet.

  77. t'ots mcakez is tots mind baughling at the "Lovesong of J. Alpelt Thrufroque" says:

    A Jerry Springer “Final Thought”: Julia Allison Baugher, the plagiarist, dog neglecting, wedding-hunting, cheating, $8 grape-fruit avoiding, false Washington Post credential claiming, condom fairy costume wearing, Gawker photo shoot undie-primping, celebrity hounding, bipolar-outing, Mac Air demanding, general media freakshow…

    Is really just doing all this because she is terrified that her haters will show up at her 15 minute panel discussion tomorrow. Little does she know that they have lives. I would count on maybe one, two for sheer entertainment value, catladiez showing up at her talk. That is being generous.

    In the meantime, she is covering her ass. Trying to make it seem like any negative feedback she receives (if she gets anything more than a cricket chirping in an empty head, err, um, oop? I mean room) is padded by her accusations of irrational hater-dom.

    Good luck, Julsie. Lipstick on a donkey won’t stick for long.

    HEE-HAWWW!

  78. Donksers says:

    Uh oh…tough guy, Richard Lutkus, coming to Donkey’s rescue.

    “@juliaallison let me know if you want help tracking any of those punks down. Coward justice can be fun”

    Richard will track us down and then Flappy will kick our asses! You boys are so vewy scawy! (It says on Richard’s twitter that he’s an “attorny.”)

    • Brianna says:

      I’m pretty sure publishing people’s legal names and contact information is real-life, actual harassment. (As opposed to fairyland ‘people on another site say mean things’ harassment.)

      • HipsterLawyerGrifter says:

        That, and it would be pretty damn hard to justify as pro-bono. Since his full name is out there in public, as is a record of contact with JA, and he is an associate for a reputable law firm (revealed by a 2-second google search), I really can’t imagine that he would compromise ethics for something this petty, or do this work outside the firm for free. The legal precedents are still very murky when it comes to internet speech, and when you’re an associate, I would imagine it’s not worth putting your ass on the line for someone else’s trivial vengeance games.

        AttorneyCats, feel free to correct me if I’m wrong in my assumptions.

        • idiotbox says:

          how about pro-boner?!

          [img]http://www.unitednothing.net/site_images/Pictures/rimshot1e.gif[/img]

    • Pink Palatian says:

      And even if he were to track people down… and do WHAT? Is he going to crack some skulls, shoot out some kneecaps, let air out of someone’s tires, …? Is he going to put his legal license in jeopardy to help Julia do any of this? In fact, I’m guessing that he’s doing so even by offering to help track people down in exchange for… ?

  79. jpa says:

    Seriously, her equating this site to bullying is like her overhearing people talking about her, and instead of walking away, she joins in and engages them. Nobody is directing this at you. STOP READING HERE. Seriously, YOU’RE making a choice, YOU’RE choosing to engage and read here. Nobody is forcing you. Here’s a high school mentality level analogy: Nobody is pushing you against a locker and threatening you, nobody is giving you swirlies, nobody is stealing your lunch money. Nobody is doing ANYTHING remotely close to the horrible acts committed against people who are actually bullied. Basically some kids in school don’t like you and you’re whining about it and trying to get them in trouble. Suck it up and move the fuck on.

    • --EVER-- says:

      Well, some people are contacting her employers, family members, etc. Those people are wrong. But then she equates this site with that behavior, which is so very dishonest on her part.

      • jpa says:

        Yeah. I posted a comment earlier that she’s painting everyone with this huge brush. Sure, there are some creepers who are contacting people in real life, which I don’t condone in the slightest. I’m also sure she has some haters who read her things on the website and make comments about how ridiculous it is, and they’ve probably never even heard of this site or her before(her work really does speak for itself). I do think that she’s spinning things to act as though people on this site are engaging her and relentlessly sending her messages/tweets ect, which I really don’t think is true.

        • Brianna says:

          She seems to believe that 100% of the people who do not like her are frequent users of this site.

          And we are the ONLY REASON people don’t like her! Just this site! No one else thinking something she writes is dumb! Just us! We are the only ones!!!

          Which isn’t even logical.

    • Cindy McCain's Medicine Cabinet says:

      Her equating this site to bullying really pisses me off. As per usual, she jumps on one of the latest trends and tries to build up some stupid Julia-centric view around it like she’s some expert. You’re not being bullied, Julia! Your experience is a far, far cry from the experience of the Rutgers student who killed himself after his roommate secretly broadcast his private experience in his own dorm room. Maybe live your life and little more and try to go 30 seconds without Twittering about your latest bowel movement or “lifecasting” every mundane detail of your relationship with Jack McCain.

      I actually feel bullied right now by being forced to think about Tim Ferris, Donkey and a 15-minute orgasm. These are three things that should never be put together in a sentence.

  80. FaFail Waldorf (Fashion Designer's Muse) says:

    Aw, Julie. I don’t hate you. You rarely (although it has happened a time or two) induce rage/brayge/whatever from me. I mostly just laugh. You’re not a “public figure” or just a poor little girl to me. You’re simply some dumb bitch who can’t take it when the whole world doesn’t love her, and I at once cannot comprehend people like you and am endlessly entertained by them. You’re like a 14-year-old 30-year-old with a 40-year-old’s face. In short, you are pathetic, broadcasting it for the world to see and then demanding answers as to why a person might deign to dislike you, and it amuses the ever loving fuck out of me.

    I just like this site. The writers are hilarious and about 85% of the commenters are also hilarious (and the other 15% are as gloriously tragic and gross as you, it seems). This is where I come to sip chocolate while eschewing gentleman callers after a long day of running errands at my desk and take even more pride in my pretty unplastic hair than I already did. Maybe I’m a grown up Mean Girl. Oh well. Life’s a bitch, some girls are mean. Go ahead and sue them for it I guess, but you’re not going to win anything.

    My name’s Walker (okay, it’s ACTUALLY Ecaterina, but I go by my second name. I’ve got four altogether, fitting ’em on credit cards is a real bitch. Google away!) and you can trace my IP all you want. You can’t do anything to me for thinking you’re a ridiculous brat except think the same of me. And you know what, have at it. Sorry I don’t have a vanity blog to make it easier for you, but I’m perfectly capable of maintaining a big ole ego without begging strangers to tell me how loveable I am.

    • fat man in a little coat says:

      I love this!! I agree, as much as she is the embodiment of the disgusting internet persona (which is deep down why i find her repellent)- this site is really a perfect example of What Not to Wear/Do, and for that I get many laughs at the end of a day filled with sometimes running errands but mostly just working out (e.g. B-school).

      Suck it fatty!

    • bitchface says:

      OMG awesome comment… PINK WIN!
      favorite part: “You’re like a 14-year-old 30-year-old with a 40-year-old’s face.”

  81. hoosierlawyerdaddy says:

    i won’t engage her on her site, but when she has the gall to say something like – you can’t tell me one instance in which i’ve invited this attention – i’d simply ask her how often she has either engaged gawker or rbns directly or done it through intermediaries? she has admitted to this happening. and we all know she’s done it from her IP on rbns and from people in the gawker circles confirming it. donk, you are certifiable. i’m so happy for you that your business gets a tenth as many like/reblogs on tumblr as some random Filipino teenager posting sparkly pictures. if that was my career, i’d call it a hobby too. and looks like your column is going global – what is it 3 papers so far? at least in the kind of papers that actually register in google? i’ve no doubt a few randoms have “poked the beast” as they say and contacted aspects of your life, but how dare you equate those whackjobs with the larger community of people who like to laugh at the spectacle you have made of your life and see it as quite karmic given the truly atrocious things we’ve seen you do online. disclosing a supposed loved one’s mental health issues – unforgivable. contacting an ex’s new partner on the verge of them beginning their new life together as husband and wife – unforgivable. there are just so many things you do in your entitled special snow-flake way that makes people dislike you. we are not a community of haters (though some no doubt exist and intermingle her on occasion) we are a community of people who dislike who you are and what you stand for. just look at your own life with some degree of honesty for 5 damn minutes. Where are your “sisters” from nonsociety? How are you received by businesses with whom you have worked? You can argue semantics and julia-legalese all day long if you want re. whether you’ve ever in your life been “fired,” but Jesus, you’ve sure seemed to have had a lot of “amicable parting of ways” after short periods of time with organizations who now want nothing to do with you. nary a bridge stands unburned over the river baugher. probably makes sense at this point to find a group to blame for your career prospects and try to glob onto this bullying issue in the news. But it is incredibly disrespectful to the issue of bullying that youth face, and in many ways capture once again perfectly why it is so many don’t like you and how you present yourself. but what do i know, i’m just a hater who has had their career blow up, doesn’t have a real job no matter how i spin it and is living in my parent’s place… oh wait… that’s not me at all…

  82. KashMoney says:

    SHE DOES NOT HAVE “EMPLOYERS”!!!!!!!!!!

    Syndicated columnists are not employees!!!!

    RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE

  83. Julia's Permanent Braycation from Reality says:

    Part of being a spokesperson or a columnist or whatever it is she calls herself lately is selling something to the public. If the public doesn’t like it, not only do they have a right to say so, but to be honest, they have a right to contact Tribune Media Services or Citybuzz or whoever made the mistake of hiring her and letting them know. Contacting her family and friends is completely out of hand and a little twisted, but contacting her employers to tell them that she’s an unpleasant, unsuccessful spokesperson for their brand? I would assume that’s pretty normal. No one wants to hire someone whom the vast majority of people find unlikable, and it’s in a company’s best interest to know.

    What makes me so angry about her is that there is so much legitimate content on the internet now – there are so many thoughtful, well-written blogs written by people who are capable of producing worthwhile commentary. The fact that she is able to be even as marginally successful as she is without doing anything other than crowd-sourcing twitter DOES offend me, and if that makes me a jealous hater, I’m okay with it.

    I used to think I was bullied when I was in middle school, too. It’s called being in middle school. Then I grew up and realized I was a whiny white girl from a middle class family who was just mad the popular kids didn’t like me. I’m not saying I never got my feelings hurt, and I’m not saying people were never cruel to me, just like I’m not saying that I’m sure many of her “haters” hurt her feelings and are cruel to her. But I am saying that eventually, you’ve got to grow out of it and stop feeling sorry for yourself.

    • Sausage Snappers says:

      This. I really dislike the notion that people who comment on her articles or videos online are somehow crazy. There is no rule that says I have to keep my opinions of her and her work only on this website.

      Contacting family members? That is definitely overstepping.

  84. Hobby Partner says:

    Whoever wrote this on her blerg sums up everything:

    “I just don’t think you get to choose how people react to what you present publicly. It’s not bullying when someone disagrees with you.

    The internet is an ecosystem, and you get back what you put in.”

  85. AllDayBray says:

    It’s remarkable how quickly she’s aging. For fuck’s sake…she looks 45 in that photo. The state of our soul affects our bodies, so its no surprise Julia’s body is curdling and rotting.

    But seriously, in 10 years she’s going to look like a straight up grandmother. I can see why she’s so desperate to marry a McCain to take care of her for the rest of her life. If getting hitched as a crazy, aging 30 year old spinster-in-training is this hard, then being 40 and alone and full blown cray will make it damn near impossible.

    Maybe Randi Zuckerburg can give Julia some beauty tips, since despite her bad teeth and fetus she is MUCH sexier and hotter than Julia Baugher.

Comments are closed.